The results of the regression analysis showed that according to its beta weights, variables contributing significantly to adolsents’ perceptions of their relations with father were educational level of fathers, elementary school education only, F =.56, p >.452, high school education only, F = 1.19, p >.303, university degree only, F =3.15, p < .025 and conflict resolutions behaviors, F=3.15, p<.025. Stepwise regression analysis was completed in four steps for perceived fathers-adolescents relations. At the end of first three step, fathers' education level accounted for 3 % of the total variance. One way analysis of variance indicated that there was significant differences in perceived fathers-adolescents relations according to the level of fathers education (F = 2,87 p<.023). A posthoc Tukey test was carried out to compare the average of education groups. Mean difference was significant only between adolesents whose fathers' were elementary and high school graduation. Adolesents having fathers' with elementary school graduation perceived more positively their relation with fathers than those with high school graduation (p<.05).When conflict resolution was entered into the equation in Step 4, explained variance of CRS increased from 3 % to 5 %, F = 4.25, p< .002. The educational levels of father accounted for 5 % of the total variance 95 % of the variance was not explained in this analysis.
The fresh trying to find recommend that the more functional beliefs regarding dating, individuals have, more likely he has argument solution routines
Contained in this study, it absolutely was investigated this new character from impaired dating thinking toward each other the perceptions of their relationships towards mothers and you may conflict quality practices of one’s later adolescence. Morever, irrational relationhip beliefs notably shared book difference off part for the forecasting one’s dispute resolution routines. These types of impact are consistent with early in the day lookup results emphazing the importance out of individuals’ impaired opinions in conflict solution habits (Haferkamp, 1994; Metts Cupach, 1990; Sillars, 1980; Timofiev, 1993)
It relationship ranging from dysfunctional matchmaking values and you can conflict quality behaviors try highest height inside Interpersonal Rejection Subscale of ICDS. While the values regarding the social rejection was the most significant predictor of conflict solution routines, they informed me significant ratio for variance off dispute solution behavior. These subscales include beliefs bad attributions of the individuals to people’ behaviors and functions for example “people don’t see me, people do not take amateurmatch-datingwebsite on myself as i am for the a social environment,” “I’m refuted easily inform you my personal thoughts and feelings to people to me personally,” “People don’t keep their claims”. Apparently it trying to find try similar to the attribution principle which stresses that more bad answers to the lover are probably that occurs in the event the personal attributed companion qualities or decisions while the the cause of your own dilemmas. And have, Sillars (1980) found that attributions out of obligation to help you lovers inside a connection is definitely regarding the distributive disagreement tips.
Additionally, disagreement resolution habits require an advanced level of telecommunications that requires self- disclosure, knowledge of one other. Put simply, positive dispute resolutions choices request a man set aside anxiety, stress and you may defensiveness (Shi, 2003). In the event the individual believe that getting extremely close to other people in their matchmaking grounds which have negative outcomes instance “being sexual with folks usually creates problems”, “It is always good for remain shallow our dating with people” and they can get go into a connection that have concern about rejection and additionally they could possibly get end direct communication plus sexual telecommunications and fundamentally will get withdraw from disagreement solution.
Moreover, when you look at the books, it actually was learned that this new relationship within impaired relationships thinking and quality of relationship tended to feel a little lower to have this new non-logical shot compared to medical class
Reverse the newest presumption, impaired relationhips viewpoints was not coordinated understood moms and dad-adolescent interactions and are generally not significant predictor impacting observed mothers-adolescents affairs. Also, people with lower and you can highest dysfunctional philosophy don’t discriminate within the perceieved mother or father-adolescent relationhip. Fundamentally, it result was not served most other training (Erytiksel, 2003; Erytiksel Aktin, 2003; Vincent-Roehling Robin, 1986) and you will intellectual behavioural friends theory and therefore places emphasis on unwanted effects regarding unreasonable convinced to the loved ones worry (Dattilio, 2005; Robin Promote, 1989; Schwebel Good, 1994; Smith Schwebel, 1995). These performance is actually sourced from the caractherictic from ICDS. ICDS level standard impaired values linked to social matchmaking despite of cognitions out of mother or father-adolescent connections. Second, the sample try contained low-logical partnered somebody. (Eidelson Epstein, 1982; Emmelkamp, Krol, Sanderman, Ruphan, 1987).